Skip to main content

President Obama’s Republic Day Visit: A Backgrounder

Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, will be in India as the Chief Guest for Republic Day celebrations. He will be the first US President to be invited as the Republic Day chief guest and his recent predecessors have been Prime Minster Abe of Japan, King Jigme Wangchuck of Bhutan, Prime Minister Shinawatra from Thailand, President Susilo Yudhoyono of Indonesia and President Lee Myung Bak from South Korea. The series of Asian heads of state being invited in the recent past reflects India’s closer ties across Asian countries eastward of India. Now India’s invitation to President Obama reflects the high importance India accords to the US and its sense of urgency in recasting the India US relations. This can also be seen as an extension of India’s Act East policy as the Pacific Ocean makes the US an integral actor in East Asia as well.
Thus, right from the moment being announced in the social media by Prime Minister Modi, this upcoming visit has created a lot of anticipation and expectations about the future of India US relations are as high as it could get. However, beyond the photo opportunities, for this visit to be memorable the attention will have to be on deliverables and timeframes. Over the last decade, India US relations have been largely rhetorical despite the Indo-US nuclear deal. Subsequent events like the 26/11 and the participation of the US national and allegedly spy in that was a significant event, so has been the Nuclear Liability Bill that the US and others believe has delayed investments into India. US has often suggested India dilute the Bill to facilitate more American investments in the field of nuclear energy whereas India has said that it is unlikely to happen. India is also yet to ratify the Brussels Supplementary Convention that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had promised when President Obama visited last in 2010. Thus the nearly 10-year-old bilateral deal has not turned into nuclear technology or material trade between India and the US. On the other hand, India feels that while the US seeks synergy with India on the East Asian front, it does not pay adequate attention to the Indian concerns in South Asia, particularly with reference to the evolving situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In particular, the US decision to release $532 million to Pakistan within days of the 2008 Mumbai Attacks’ mastermind being released is not likely to please Delhi. In addition, the usual challenge of H1-B visa restrictions that hurt Indian companies and their business in the US will again come up for discussion as the recent indicators suggest. So the efforts to arrest the drift in the bilateral relations is not without hurdles.
Prime Minister Modi’s first official visit to the US in September 2014 had two components; first being to personally connect with his Indian American well wishers who had also generously funded his campaign for the 2014 elections, the second was to connect with the establishment including the President. His rockstar receptions and the joint editorial with President Obama as well as the comprehensive joint statements had showcased that these objectives were well achieved. Now is the time to put the mantra of “Chalein Saath Saath: Forward Together We Go”, highlighted in the joint statement of September 2014, into practice.
Towards the preparation of the important Presidential visit, the US Secretary of State John Kerry visited India as US representative for the Vibrant Gujarat Summit where he also met Prime Minister Modi. Nisha Desai Biswal, US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia also visited India earlier in November 2014 to fine tune the details of President Obama’s visit. Kerry’s participation in Gandhinagar was seen as the US interest in participating in Prime Minister Modi’s make in India campaign.
Now, with two key reforms in land and labour laws in place, making them more investor friendly, the American business community is likely to turn towards India for its investments.  It is no surprise then that a big American CEOs delegation will accompany India just like a substantial number of Indian CEOs joined Prime Minister Modi’s delegation to the US.
US had also readily agreed to participate in the smart city project promoted by the Indian Prime Minister by becoming the lead partner in developing Ajmer, Vishakhapatnam and Allahabad. In addition, the USAID is going to be a knowledge partner in urban sanitation, water and hygiene projects as part of India’s National Urban Development Mission and Clean India Mission. Clean energy is another area where technology cooperation agreement is likely to take place.
India wants the Make in India campaign to be emulated in the field of defense cooperation. By doing so, increases military capability will be simultaneously helpful in enhancing India’s defense technology industry, by joint research and production plans and technology transfers. India seeks the preset offset policy to help create business and employment domestically as well as to encourage greater science and technology research by stimulating demand from the industry for qualified personnel thereby attracting talent in this field. While there may be initial hurdles, this will be a big test for what is always referred to as creating “win-win” situations in bilateral economic engagement. Therefore, India will and must resist calls for diluting the offset and FDI policy in defense as this is the only way to create long term solutions for India’s defense equipment and technology import dependence.
While India and the US share broad agreement over the state of affairs of the global order as well as on the state of their bilateral relations, they have realized over the course of the last decade that they are not on the same page as far as the finer details and the methods to achieve their intended outcomes are concerned. The devil, as they say, is in the detail. Towards that end, President Obama’s India visit should help the two countries work out the finer details and help operationalize the India US strategic and economic partnership after years of promising starts.


(Avinash Godbole is Research Assistant with the IDSA and the opinions expressed here are completely personal)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Blame China? We are a House Divided One of the articles published in the Chinese Institute for International and Strategic Studies has talked of the ease with which India can be divided into 20-30 parts in the future to prevent the country from rising as a strategic rival for the top spot in Asia and in the world. This article has invoked a lot of heat and debate in India. This was expected given the fact that China is India’s rival and a strategic adversary in most of the situations. It is also somewhat surprising given the norms governing international relations that no one speaks so blatantly of dividing the neighbour, even if one so desired, more so if you take pride in your ‘peaceful rise’ in international relations. Moreover, the policy of beggar thy neighbour is simply dated in the era of economic cooperation and nuclear weapons. Even as the analysts in India get angry about the perception of certain Chinese scholar about India, they must not lose sight of the fact that the

Civil Military Relations and Media

In India, civil military relations have been strained in the recent past due to a couple of instances. First, it was the date of birth controversy about the serving Chief of the Army. It involved a few missing documents and a legal tangle. Even as it was solved with all honours retained, other set of controversies seem to have emerged. These new controversies perhaps have been blown out of proportion, probably because the DoB controversy was still fresh in mind. During this second phase of the controversy, corruption, under-performance and under-preparedness came into picture.  However, the icing on the cake was the whole supposed coup expose by the Indian Express. Figment of imagination, undoubtedly at its worst, was at play in creating a script that would crate yet another dud like Agent Vinod! Has the media been mature on reportage and expose? Its one thing for a letter to be leaked, but its completely different for the media to publish it without even giving it a second thou
संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन की विदेशनीती: आत्मविश्वास का अभाव अविनाश गोडबोले 2009 मे हुए चुनाव के बाद फिर एक बार कॉंग्रेसके नेतृतवमे संयुक्त प्रगतिशील गठबंधन ने सरकार बनाया . इन चुनाओमे वामपंथी दल और समाजवादी पार्टी जैसे भूतपूर्व साथियोंको भारी नुकसान हुआ और UPA मे कॉंग्रेस का स्थान मज़बूत हो गया . इसका यह परिणाम अपेक्षित था के नयी सरकार एक सकारात्मक विचारधारा लेकर आगे चलेगी और देशके भविष्य के बारेमे दिशा दर्शक काम करेगी . 1996 से 2009 तक भारतमे बने हरेक सरकार मे मुख्य पार्टी कमज़ोर रही है और प्रादेशिक अथवा वैचारिक गठबंधन डालो की स्थिति मज़बूत और निर्णायक रही है. परिणामी सरकारोँकी नीतीयाभी छोटे दलोँके हितअनुसार बदलती रही है. जब 2009 के चुनाव मे कॉंग्रेस ने सबसे ज़्यादा सीट्स पाई थी. तब यह अंदाज़ जताया गया था की उसकी मज़बूती उसके आत्मविश्वास मे परिवर्तित हो सकती है लेकिन पिछलेएक साल का विश्लेषण करतहुए भारतीय विदेशनीतिमे ऐसा कोई बदल या ऐसी कोई घोषणा दिखाई नही दी है. 26/11 के हमलो के बाद पाकिस्तान पर दबाव डालकर वहांके सरकार क